The Not-So-Big Top 40

Global has informed all stations currently taking the Big Top 40 that the chart will be withdrawn from syndication at the conclusion of its contract later this year.

The show will be solely on Capital and Heart come January after Bauer confirmed The Hits Radio Network is pulling out in favour of its own programming.

Both moves have been a long time coming.

The scale of today's industry has made commercial radio an attractive proposition for national advertisers so a network chart is no longer required to serve that purpose.

Furthermore, in practice, the days of a two-horse race between the BBC and commercial radio as a whole are gone.

Stations are now multi-platform brands and competing not just with each other but also new digital media.

This is an opportunity to develop three more hours of original, targeted, programming - and greater choice is always something to be celebrated.

The Big Top 40 has a weekly audience of 2.2m, the overwhelming majority of whom tune in on either Capital or Heart with Bauer equating to the next biggest share of listening.

For Global, there's no benefit in continuing to offer the show to a bunch of independent local stations which make up such a small percentage of its reach and TSL.

This is no mid 00s "chart wars" - when EMAP briefly introduced their own Smash Hits countdown and other short-lived syndicated shows tailored by format arrived (The A List for AC and Fresh40 for Urban) but everyone returned to the fold soon after.

This time, it's truly the end of an era for commercial radio.

The charts - does anyone still care?

Around the time I fell in love with radio as a child, iTunes was beginning to take off with some 90% of sales in the UK Official Chart coming from downloads.

Hit40UK became The Big Top 40 Show which was described by Global's Richard Park as the "first ever totally interactive chart where the listener decides" as it used real-time iTunes data meaning the top ten could change during the show.

In recent years, even this seemed old-fashioned with streaming services such as Spotify, Apple Music and Deezer now accounting for more than half of music consumption - and that's excluding video platforms.

We can debate different methodologies and accuracy until the cows come home. Above all, people still love a radio countdown (e.g. bank holiday specials or retro charts).

Whether or not today's youth really care what's number one is a different question; and if I was looking to be properly distinctive, I'm not sure I'd simply bring another weekly chart show to the party.

Bauer are replacing a network chart show because of their “relentless drive to innovate”.

The new show is a networked chart show of their own.

That is game changing innovation. https://t.co/qJmRqMvp2A

— Scott Myers (@ProducerScott) September 19, 2018

Bauer’s got all the Hits (Radio)

Key 103 will be no more as Bauer prepares to hit reset and launch Hits Radio in June - a brand-new national station broadcasting from Manchester with Gethin Jones, Gemma Atkinson and Dave Vitty (Comedy Dave) on breakfast. It sees Bauer’s “City 1” heritage FM network merge with digital station The Hits and the slightly awkward “City 3” network (essentially a feed of the former on local DAB muxes).

It’s a gamble for sure, but the right one: local heritage only takes you so far when the real growth is in national listening. Global’s already proved that tidy networks like Heart, Capital and Smooth win big with listeners and advertisers. Agencies don’t want a bag of local logos; they want one neat brand they can understand in 30 seconds.

All other heritage brands will remain, at least for now. Clyde 1, Hallam FM, Radio City and the rest stay on air, but now tied neatly into the Hits Radio Network. That means familiar local brands survive (which keeps loyal audiences on side) while the company finally has a coherent national flagship to shout about. This lowers the churn risk, gives Bauer scale, and makes the whole portfolio a lot easier to sell.

The DAB rollout isn’t perfect yet (with little to no coverage outside of existing markets) but the direction’s clear: Manchester is leading the charge, and Bauer finally look ready to go toe-to-toe with Global.

Commercial radio deregulation - what's next?

The Commercial Radio Deregulation consultation has been published today:

There are a number of outdated and burdensome regulations in place for analogue radio which were put in place back in the late 1980s, while digital radio enjoys much more freedom in comparison. Following a number of recommendations made by Ofcom, this consultation outlines our proposals for how we intend to deregulate commercial radio.

As the radio market is changing with more people move towards digital and online audio services, and as Ofcom’s scope to make further changes is limited by the current regulatory framework, the Government believes it is the right time to consider the overall regulatory structure for commercial radio.

We welcome comments from individuals and organisations involved in the commercial radio sector, including members of the public who hold an interest in commercial radio.

Put simply, Ofcom will no longer have to "secure provision within the United Kingdom of a diversity of national services, each catering for tastes and interests different from those catered for by the others, and a range and diversity of local services" - as per section 85 of the Broadcasting Act 1990.

The proposals include a new duty on Ofcom to secure the provision of news and other core information such as travel and weather, including stations on DAB from the date following a future digital switchover.

All other format requirements that apply to local and regional analogue licences will be scrapped, allowing stations to play whatever music they wish, and operators will no longer need studios within the TSA, meaning locally-relevant content can be produced centrally as long as journalists are retained in each of the existing editorial areas to source stories.

None of this is unexpected and it seems mostly sensible to me.

DAB and online are delivering a wider range of formats than ever before without regulation and stations are finding their niches (not just in terms of music but the overall content and feel/mood) to attract audiences.

With today's tech, except for newsgathering, local content can be produced to an equally high standard from afar and where the microphone or playout PC is located doesn't determine the quality.

There are, however, a couple of things I would question.

The government agrees with Ofcom's assessment that without any requirements for the provision of news, and especially local news, this type of content would be underprovided by the commercial market and therefore there is a need to secure local news requirements on DAB-only stations. We have identified two broad approaches:

• Option (a) extend the national and local news/core information requirements to DAB-only stations. This means they will have obligations to also carry either national or local news (as the case may) or core local information. For digital only stations on local multiplexes in particular, this would be a significant departure from the current position.

• Option (b) place obligations on local multiplex operators to ensure that a proportion of stations (based broadly on current provision) carry local news services with the number set by Ofcom as part of their local news requirements.

One thing that has changed massively over the years is how well radio stations understand their audiences.

It is simply not true to suggest that stations always do the bare minimum. If research suggests something is of strong importance to listeners, why would they not provide it when doing so clearly makes business sense?

That said, if left to the market without regulation, can we honestly say that every part of the UK would enjoy a trustworthy local news service?

Sure - outside of radio, where there is consumer demand and support from organisations, online community resource hubs will emerge; but do they have the stamina and integrity to carry the torch?

Option A goes against the whole deregulation ethos and would likely be counterproductive - discouraging new services for whom news doesn't fit the format and/or would be financially unsustainable, therefore negatively impacting choice.

As for Option B, it was never intended that multiplex operators would influence programming in this way and such responsibility shouldn't be in the hands of a non-regulatory body which is merely a distributor.

As well as the issue of conflicting ownership of a number of muxes by competing radio groups, existing carriage arrangements and contractual obligations mean it is unlikely that there would be any legal basis for the imposition of news provision requirements anyway.

Is the fairest option for there to be a revenue threshold, whereby licences with bespoke local advertising have to provide relevant news/information?

It'll be interesting to see how the industry responds.

Another issue close to my heart is existing speech quotas on "full service" licences (I wonder why?!)

Presumably, if all format requirements other than key information are to be disposed of, these will be removed too?

The consultation runs until Monday 8th May at 5pm.

Please welcome... Hampshire Hit Radio!

From today, it's all change in South Hampshire as The New 'Sound' of Winchester, Southampton and The New Forest is here!

Building on the legacy left by previous ownership, Hampshire Hit Radio will do exactly as it says on the tin - play the greatest and latest hit music together with valuable local information (news, travel, what's on), outside broadcasts and unique locally-focused speech.

Having had to change our name, we'll grow into the new one and will take this opportunity to reach new listeners with a fresh alternative while retaining our existing audience.

Our listeners tell us they're happy as long as entertaining personalities, who understand local life, continue to play the music they love - which they will.

Furthermore, a new partnership with the firmly established local newspaper(s) will enhance our commitment to providing high quality, fair and balanced journalism.